![geekbench comparison geekbench comparison](https://shekelhertz.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/5900XGEEKBENCH-800x1074.png)
- GEEKBENCH COMPARISON UPDATE
- GEEKBENCH COMPARISON FULL
- GEEKBENCH COMPARISON PORTABLE
- GEEKBENCH COMPARISON PRO
- GEEKBENCH COMPARISON SERIES
GEEKBENCH COMPARISON FULL
Even if these benchmarks are accurate when re-testing on a full macOS Monterey build, the M1 Max is plenty powerful enough to run the demanding applications it promised it could during the Apple Fall Event.
GEEKBENCH COMPARISON PRO
With this fresh look and powerful SoC, the MacBook Pro no longer feels like an expensive folly for some people. This is a closer fight than under Geekbench, with the M1 being 28 better than the second-place Core i9 15-inch MacBook Pro, narrowly followed by the 16-inch MacBook Pro and the Core i7 Mac mini. Macs have long been favored by those working in creative jobs such as video and audio editing, but the previous MacBook models missed a few beats by removing ports and including that divisive Touch Bar.
GEEKBENCH COMPARISON PORTABLE
These scores, while not mind-blowing when stacked against the rest of the mobile workstation market, have shown that you can get near-desktop Mac performance on a portable Mac laptop, with the M1 Max outperforming every current Mac device other than the Mac Pro and iMac Pro models that are equipped with Intel's high-end 16 to 24-core Xeon chips.Īdditional variety to the CPU/GPU market is always welcome too, given the near-monopoly that previously existed. Ugly camera notch aside, both of the latest MacBook Pro devices equipped with the M1 Max feel like the first Apple laptop to really appeal to its intended market for some time. Regardless of our feelings on the performance jump, Apple has proved itself to be a formidable rival to its competitors, despite Intel and AMD having decades of developmental experience. It also reported that the CPU is running a base clock of 24MHz, but Geekbench's John Poole has since mentioned to MacRumors (opens in new tab) that this is likely attributed to Geekbench itself not correctly identifying the clock speed of the new M1 Max, rather than there being an issue with the processor. Thankfully, there are other things that could also be impacting performance numbers, such as the benchmarks being run on a pre-release version of macOS Monterey. Updated comparison chart design to improve readability.
GEEKBENCH COMPARISON UPDATE
Changed to secure connections to download update information and release notes. But, it is still impressive nonetheless.Let's not get things twisted – it isn't that the scores are unimpressive, as they sit very comfortably at the top-tier of portable workstation benchmarks, but the margins are pretty slim and the price of the new MacBook Pro 14-inch and MacBook Pro 16-inch can quickly feel ridiculous, with the most affordable M1 Max (32 core) 14-inch MacBook starting at $3,099 / £2,999 / AU$4,649. Geekbench 3.4.1 contains an important security fix for OS X and is recommended for all OS X users. It is a cross-platform, easy-to-run benchmark that exercises different aspects of the CPU. So it does not directly imply that the chip is already outperforming every other chipset in the market. Geekbench is a tremendously popular benchmark in the mobile and client space. Although, this is just synthetic benchmarks that only depict raw performance in one particular platform. This is quite impressive for a chipset that is basically two M1 Max SoCs combined together. While the new Apple chip did not beat the AMD chips, it came extremely close to matching both chipsets. Just saying, but geekbench scales a lot worse on windows than on macos so scores aren't really comparable, Cinebench is better Furthermore, we had also recently reported on an early benchmark of the M1 Ultra nearly rivaling the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X processor, which has a whopping 64 cores. Keep in mind, the Threadripper has 32 cores while the M1 Ultra has just 20 cores. The data on this chart is gathered from user-submitted Geekbench 5. This is a enterprise grade processor that scored 27603 points in multi core tests. Benchmark results for the Mac Pro with an Intel Xeon 5160 processor can be found below. However, the M1 Ultra’s performance really impressive when you pit it against Team Red’s Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX chipset. Although, its single core tests were slightly faster with a score of 1893. This result was quite impressive considering it beat Team Blue’s high end Core i9-12900K processor that only scored 17,299 points in the multi core tests. This chipset has been surfacing on benchmarking platforms, and now, the chipset has been spotted on GeekBench where it beat some notable chips from Intel and AMD.Īccording to a Tweet from the Cupertino based giant’s newly unveiled M1 Ultra passed through GeekBench with a score of 24,055 points in the multi core tests and 1793 points in single core tests.
GEEKBENCH COMPARISON SERIES
Apple had just launched its top end desktop series processor, the M1 Ultra.